Cuil - The Good Looking Search Engine
I came accross a referrer over in mint a while ago from a search on a site from http://www.cuil.com/. I usually check out referrers (especially new search engines), and I was pleasantly surprised by this site in particular.
The site is amazing - the homepage has a really awesome live suggestion system and looks very sleek. The whole site design and interface is neither intrusive or old looking, and the search results themselves are displayed in a way that i’ve never seen from a search engine before. The whole site just feels right, and although I’m not familiar enough with it to use as a Google replacement this site proves that search engines can have great designs, and still be functional.
Unlike Google’s list layout for results, cuil displays the results in a sleek grid layout, and lets you select whether you want a double or triple column view.
I think this type of search engine will eventually be the future, but while Google offers much more than plain searching they will always be a major contender to the new and slick search engines appearing all over the internet. While Google and other big search engines have the resources for bigger and faster, the modern style and less popular search engines have the capabilities to be slicker and more experimental with their features.


Reader Comments
2 responses so far
1Chris August 25th, 2008 at 7:40 pm
2Alan August 26th, 2008 at 10:16 am
Leave a commentCuil is definitely going for it, but it’s hard to imagine them doing anything but incremental changes to what Google’s done. And even that would take years of effort.
Me.dium.com has taken a different tack. We have a full web index, but we change the results based on the surfing activity of our user base (now over 2,000,000). It’s in alpha, but I’d be curious to hear your thoughts. http://me.dium.com/search
Quite honestly I wouldn’t use it. A search for iPod on me.dium doesn’t return a Wikipedia article like Google does, it returns some weird accessories site - Apple is the 7th result.
I don’t think relying on what people search for is the right way to build results, you’re basically stereotyping everyone and assuming that they want to find the same thing from a search keyword - not everyone looks for the same thing. My point is proven with the iPod search, why would everyone searching iPod want an accessories site? They wouldn’t.
Cuil is eye candy, but me.dium is just bright orange and something I wouldn’t need to use.
(Common, even Live Search gets the iPod search right…)